G1519 · Index: Waste Management, Waste Resource

2005–2009, 2012 · Revised August 2021

Calculating the Value of Manure for Crop Production

Javed Iqbal, Extension Soil Specialist, Nutrient Management

Leslie Johnson, Extension Educator, Animal Manure Management

Amy Schmidt, Livestock Bioenvironmental Engineer

This NebGuide provides criteria and guidelines to determine the market value of manure for crop production.

Manure has value for crop production when it provides nutrients or soil amendments needed for optimum crop yields. Manure does not supply nutrients in balance with crop needs, but has the advantage of slowly releasing nutrients which reduces the risk of nitrate leaching. Manure nutrient content varies widely due to weather conditions, the livestock facility, manure storage systems, the age of manure, and feed composition. Low nutrient concentration due to weathering and dilution with water or soil decreases the value of manure. The organic material in manure also can improve soil productivity by increasing the water infiltration rate and water-holding capacity. On some soils, this gain in productivity may be more than its nutrient value.

The worksheet1 on page 3 is used for calculating the fertilizer value of a manure source for a specific field. It includes the value of needed nutrients for a four-year period and offers the option of including the value of manure nutrients used after that. The value of other benefits of using manure, such as an expected yield increase, can be estimated. An example worksheet is included on page 4. To complete the worksheet you will need one or more recent analyses of the manure to be valued, a recent soil test for the application area, recommendations for nutrients needed for the next and following crops, and current fertilizer prices.

Determining Nutrient Value of Manure

Manure or compost should be applied at or below the rate that meets the nitrogen (N) need of the next or current crop. Applying manure to meet the crop’s nitrogen needs usually results in applying substantially more phosphate (P2O5), potash (K2O), sulfur (S), and zinc (Zn) than is needed by the crop. University of Nebraska–Lincoln recommendations for P2O5, K2O, and Zn are based on meeting crop needs while slowly building soil nutrient levels.2 This is generally the most profitable option for nutrient management. For corn, sorghum, soybean, and sugar beet, research results show no economic benefit to nutrient applications that raise soil test levels higher than 20 ppm phosphorus (P) (Bray-1 P test), 125 ppm potassium (K), and 0.8 ppm zinc. Yields of alfalfa, wheat, and six other crops respond to higher soil phosphorus levels.3

Applying large quantities of nutrients at one time, in excess of recommendations, may be profitable when interest rates are low and nutrients are inexpensive, as may be the case with manure nutrients. A producer receives value from these excess nutrients only if subsequent crops remove the nutrients before more nutrients are applied. This approach is acceptable for relatively immobile soil nutrients like phosphorus, potassium, and zinc, applied where or in a way such that phosphorus is not likely to be transported to surface water, and if total available nitrogen does not exceed crop utilization in year one. Nitrogen released in subsequent years from the organic-N in manure can be credited toward future crop needs.

The organic matter in manure may improve soil productivity and crop yields. For example, manure demonstration plots in Nebraska from 1996 to 2001 produced an average of 7 bu/ac more corn (14 site years) and 2 bu/ac more soybean (6 site years) where manure or manure plus fertilizer was applied compared to fertilizer alone. Soybean in one other site year lost 4.5 bu/ac due to compaction during manure application and incorporation. Line 12 in the worksheet provides a place to include the value of a yield increase. This value is typically between $0 and $60 per acre. Expect less yield increase on fine and high organic matter soil, or if the land has a recent history of manure. Expect greater increase on sandy, eroded, or disturbed soil with no recent manure history.

Manure Testing

Manure varies greatly in nutrient content so recent samples of the manure or effluent to be applied should be analyzed by a laboratory to determine nutrient content.4 Without a lab test, a “book” value of typical nutrients in manure could be used, but this is not recommended since the actual concentration of one or more nutrients in any manure is often several times more or less than the “book” value.

Availability of Manure Nitrogen

Manure nitrogen is mostly in two forms: ammonium nitrogen and organic nitrogen. All ammonium nitrogen is available the first year if it is not lost. Ammonium nitrogen is quickly lost from manure spread in a thin layer and left on the surface of either a feedlot or a field. Cooler temperatures at time of spreading will slow ammonia loss. Ammonium nitrogen is retained once it is incorporated into the soil (Table I) by injection, tillage, or by rainfall or irrigation of one-half inch or more.

Organic nitrogen is slowly released during warm weather by microbial action. From 40 to 45 percent of the organic nitrogen in manure becomes available to crops in the first year (Table II). About 20 percent of the original organic nitrogen in manure or compost is released in year two, 10 percent in year three, and 5 percent in year four. Much of the organic nitrogen in manure is not recovered by crops in the following years.

Table I. Fraction of ammonium nitrogen available this year.

Sidedress Application

Injected

0.95

Sprinkler Irrigated

>0.4” applied 0.8

≤ 0.4” applied 0.4

Preplant Application and Not Incorporated

Surface applied in spring or fall

0.00

Preplant Application and Incorporated

Temperature at Time of Spreading

Manure Form

Solid

Liquid > 50°F

Liquid ≤ 50°F

Immediately

0.95

0.95

0.95

One day later

0.50

0.70

0.70

Two days later

0.25

0.45

0.55

Three days later

0.15

0.25

0.45

Seven+ days later

0.00

0.00

0.40

Table II. Fraction of organic nitrogen available this year.

Beef/Dairy Manure

Solid or stored liquid

0.40

Composted feedlot

0.15

Swine Manure

0.40

Poultry Manure

Layers with no bedding

0.45

All other poultry

0.40

Worksheet Instructions

(Worksheet instructions continued below worksheet)

Worksheet to calculate the value of manure.

(Instructions for most lines are on page 2.)

For an interactive version of this worksheet visit http://go.unl.edu/manurevalue. When you input your numbers, the calculations will automatically be figured.

Value of Yield Increase

Year #1

Year #2

Total Value

Crop

Yield Increase

Value/unit

Value/acre

Crop

Yield Increase

Value/unit

Value/acre

Example

corn

5 bu/ac

$5.50/bu

$27.50

soybean

1.5 bu/ac

$13.00/bu

$19.50/ac

$47.00/ac

Sample worksheet to calculate the value of manure. (Instructions for most lines are on page 2.)

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge Charles Wortmann and Charles Shapiro, former Soil Extension Specialists, and Richard DeLoughery, former extension water quality educator, for contributions to a previous version of the publications.

References

1. This worksheet is based on a publication from the University of Missouri, Calculating the Value of Manure as a Fertilizer Source, G9330, https://extension.missouri.edu/publications/g9330.

2. Nutrient Management for Agronomic Crops in Nebraska, University of Nebraska–Lincoln Extension EC155, https://extensionpubs.unl.edu/publication/9000016363764/nutrient-management-for-agronomic-crops-in-nebraska/.

3. Fertilizer Suggestions for Corn, EC117 (revised December 2014), https://extensionpubs.unl.edu/publication/9000016366926/fertilizer-suggestions-for-corn/.

4. Fertilizer Suggestions for Soybeans, G859 (revised April 2019), https://extensionpubs.unl.edu/publication/9000016361216/fertilizer-recommendations-for-soybean/.


This publication has been peer reviewed.

Nebraska Extension publications are available online at http://extension.unl.edu/publications.

Extension is a Division of the Institute of Agriculture and Natural Resources at the University of Nebraska–Lincoln cooperating with the Counties and the United States Department of Agriculture.

Nebraska Extension educational programs abide with the nondiscrimination policies of the University of Nebraska–Lincoln and the United States Department of Agriculture.

© 2021, The Board of Regents of the University of Nebraska on behalf of the University of Nebraska–Lincoln Extension. All rights reserved.